What is mechanical engineering?
Paul
D. Ronney
Associate Professor
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453
Slides
on-line at:
http:/carambola.usc.edu/ENGR101
Definition of mechanical engineering
If it needs engineering but it doesn't involve electrons, chemical reactions, arrangement of molecules, life forms, isn't a structure (building/bridge/dam) and doesn't fly, a mechanical engineer will take care of it
(if it does involve
electrons, chemical reactions, arrangement of molecules, life
forms, is a structure or does fly, that's OK too)
ME Curriculum
Basic sciences - math, chemistry, physics
Breadth, distribution
Tools
Computer graphics, computer aided design
Electronics
Experimental engineering & instrumentation
Mechanical design - nuts, bolts, gears, welds
Computational methods - convert continuous mathematical equations into discrete equationsF = ma Æ F = m
= m
![]()
Core "engineering science"
Mechanics
Statics: SF = 0
Dynamics: SF = ma Strength of materials:
Mechanical stress:
![]()
Vibration of beams:
![]()
Fluid mechanics - F = ma applied to a fluid
Thermodynamics 1st Law - energy is conserved - "you can't win"
2nd Law - entropy always increases - "you can't break even" Heat transfer
Conduction - q = -kA
![]()
Convection - q = hA(Tf - Tw)
Radiation - q = seFA(T4 - Tw4)
Control systems
Synthesis
Senior seminar
Senior design project
- "capstone"
Examples of industries employing ME's
Automotive
Combustion
Engines, transmissions
Suspensions
Aerospace (w/ aerospace engineers)
Control systems
Heat transfer in turbines
Fluid mechanics (internal & external)
Computers (w/ computer engineers)
Heat transfer
Packaging of components & systems
Construction (w/ civil engineers)
Heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC)
Stress analysis
Electrical power generation (w/ electrical engineers)
Steam power cycles - heat and work
Mechanical design of turbines, generators, ...
Petrochemicals (w/ chemical, petroleum engineers)
Oil drilling - stress, fluid flow, structures
Design of refineries - piping, pressure vessels
Robotics (w/ electrical engineers)
Mechanical design of actuators, sensors
Stress analysis
Personal experience #1 - automotive engineering
Why internal combustion engines? - alternatives & their limitations
External combustion - steam engine
Heat transfer is too slow (100x slower than combustion)
10 B-747 engines = large coal-fueled electric power plant
Electric vehicles
Batteries are heavy - 1000 lbs/gallon of gasoline equiv.
Fuel cells better, but still nowhere near gasoline
"Zero emissions" myth - exports pollution
Solar
Need 30 ft x 30 ft collector for 15 hp
(Arizona, high noon, mid-summer) Nuclear
Who are we kidding ???
Moral - hard to beat gasoline-fueled premixed-charge IC engine for
Power/weight & power/volume of engine
Energy/weight & energy/volume of liquid hydrocarbon fuel
Things you need to understand before you invent the clean 100 mpg 1000 hp engine, revolutionize the automotive industry and shop for your retirement home on the French Riviera
Room for improvement - factor of 2x in efficiency
Ideal Otto cycle engine with CR = 8: 52%
Real engine: 30% maximum
Differences because of Heat losses
Friction losses
Throttling losses
Room for improvement - in pollutants
Pollutants are a non-equilibrium effect
Burn: Fuel + O2 + N2 Æ H2O + CO2 + CO + UHC + NO
Expand: CO + UHC + NO "frozen" at high levels With slow adiabatic (no heat loss) expansion:
CO + UHC + NO Æ H2O + CO2 + N2
...but we can't slow down the expansion or make it adiabatic
Room for improvement - very little in power
IC engines are air processors
Fuel takes up little space - air flow = power
Limitation on air flow due to
Limitation on rotation rate
Friction
Mechanical strength
Slow burn
"Choked" flow past intake valves
Idea for improvement
Throttleless Premixed-Charge Engines
Engines frequently operated at lower than maximum torque output (throttled conditions)
Throttling adjusts torque output of engines by reducing intake density through decrease in pressure via fluid-dynamic losses ( P = rRT)
Throttling losses substantial at part load

Our idea - Throttleless Premixed-Charge Engine
U. S. Patent No. 5,184,592
Use intake temperature increment via exhaust heat transfer to reduce r
Increasing Tintake leads to leaner lean misfire limit - use air/fuel ratio AND Tintake to control torque
Substantially improved fuel economy (up to 16 %) compared to throttled engine at same power & RPM
Emissions
(Untreated) NOx performance > 10 x lower than throttled engine
Meets federal emission standards (0.4 g/mi)
CO and UHC comparable to throttled engine
Conclusions - engines
IC engines are the worst form of vehicle propulsion, except for all the other forms
Despite over 100 years of evolution, IC engines are far from optimized
Any new idea must consider many factors, e.g.
Where significant gains can & cannot be made
Cost
Resistance of suppliers & consumers to change
Personal experience #2 - Fire safety in spacecraft
Motivation
Gravity influences combustion through buoyant convection
Hot gases rise - changes heat & fuel transport, flame shape
Case study - "Flame balls"
Zeldovich, 1944: stationary spherical flames ("flame balls")
have solutions for unbounded domain only in spherical geometry (no "flame cylinders" or "flame slabs" possible)
T ~ 1/r unlike propagating flame (T ~ e-r) - properties dominated by long 1/r tail (with r3 volume effects!)
Theory (1985): flame balls are unstable

Ronney (1990): seemingly stable, stationary flame balls accidentally discovered in drop-tower experiments; confirmed in parabolic aircraft flights (Ronney et al., 1993)
Only seen at µg, light fuel (e.g. H2), weak mixtures near extinction limits
New theory (1990): window of stable conditions when radiant heat loss is present
Practical value of flame ball studies
Stationary spherical flame - simplest interaction of chemistry & transport - test combustion models
Spacecraft fire safety - flame balls exist in mixtures outside one-g extinction limits
May be relevant to near-limit turbulent combustion of H2 - proposed for Low-Emission Vehicles
Implementation of space experiment
Experimental apparatus
Combustion vessel - cylinder, 32 cm i.d. x 32 cm length
15 gas mixtures
Ignition system - spark
2 video cameras
Temperature - fine-wire thermocouples, 6 locations
Radiometers (4), chamber pressure, acceleration (3 axes)
Space Shuttle mission MSL-1 (April 4 - 8, 1997) & MSL-1R (July 1 - 16, 1997), Combustion Module-1 (CM-1) facility
Trained as backup crew member for missions
Results - surprises
(1) Much less buoyancy-induced drift than expected - may be hours before drifting into walls (partially understood now)
(2) Flame balls drifted apart - mutual repulsion - consuming each other's fuel (mostly understood now)
(3) Data drastically affected by impulses caused by small thrusters used to control Orbiter attitude (understood now)
(4) 2 missions, 26 burn tests, wide range of pressure, diffusivity, radiation properties, # of balls, etc., yet every single flame ball, without exception, produced between 1.0 and 1.8 Watts of radiant power !!!!! (not understood at all)
Summary - fires in space
First premixed gas combustion experiment in space
Weakest flames ever burned, either on the ground or in space (flame ball: 1 Watt; birthday candle: 50 watts)
Many surprises despite 13 years of ground-based experiments & modeling Space flight training _ "the right stuff" any more
Summary - Mechanical Engineering
Perhaps broadest engineering discipline
Everybody needs ME's
Core material
permeates all engineering systems (fluid mechanics, solid
mechanics, heat transfer, control systems, ...)